Photo via yalibnan.com |
All eyes are on the international community, mainly the United States, to
see whether a chemical attack by Syrian President Bashar Assad regime forces in
the Damascus region on August 21 will go unpunished.
Rockets with chemical agents hit the Damascus suburbs of Ain Tarma,
Zamalka and Jobar at dawn last Wednesday as residents were still sleeping. Some
1,300 were killed in the rocket strike, most of them women and children.
With unforgettable horror images still emerging, the international
medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)
reported Saturday (August 24) that three hospitals in Syria's Damascus
governorate that are supported MSF have reported to MSF they received
approximately 3,600 patients displaying neurotoxic symptoms in less than three
hours on the morning of Wednesday, August 21, 2013. Of those patients, 355
reportedly died.
Meanwhile, U.S. President Barack Obama and UK Prime Minister David Cameron
are "gravely concerned" by "increasing signs this was a
significant chemical weapons attack carried out by the Syrian regime."
A Downing Street spokesperson said
Cameron and Obama discussed the situation in Syria by telephone Saturday
afternoon:
“They are both gravely concerned by the attack that took
place in Damascus on Wednesday and the increasing signs that this was a
significant chemical weapons attack carried out by the Syrian regime against
its own people. The UN Security Council has called for immediate access for UN
investigators on the ground in Damascus. The fact that President Assad has
failed to cooperate with the UN suggests that the regime has something to hide.
“They reiterated that significant use of chemical weapons
would merit a serious response from the international community and both have
tasked officials to examine all the options. They agreed that it is vital that
the world upholds the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons and deters
further outrages. They agreed to keep in close contact on the issue.”
Médecins Sans Frontières
In a statement
released in Brussels and New York on Saturday, MSF, the Nobel Peace Prize
winner (1999), says that since 2012 it has built a strong and reliable
collaboration with medical networks, hospitals and medical points in the
Damascus governorate, and has been providing them with drugs, medical equipment
and technical support. Due to significant security risks, MSF staff members
have not been able to access the facilities.
“Medical staff working in these facilities provided detailed
information to MSF doctors regarding large numbers of patients arriving with
symptoms including convulsions, excess saliva, pinpoint pupils, blurred vision
and respiratory distress,” said Dr. Bart Janssens, MSF director of operations.
Patients were treated using MSF-supplied atropine, a drug
used to treat neurotoxic symptoms. MSF is now trying to replenish the
facilities’ empty stocks and provide additional medical supplies and guidance.
“MSF can neither scientifically confirm the cause of these
symptoms nor establish who is responsible for the attack,” said Dr. Janssens.
“However, the reported symptoms of the patients, in addition to the
epidemiological pattern of the events -- characterized by the massive influx of
patients in a short period of time, the origin of the patients and the
contamination of medical and first aid workers -- strongly indicate mass
exposure to a neurotoxic agent. This would constitute a violation of
international humanitarian law, which absolutely prohibits the use of chemical
and biological weapons.”
In addition to 1,600 vials of atropine supplied over recent
months, MSF has now dispatched 7,000 additional vials to facilities in the
area. Treatment of neurotoxic patients is now being fully integrated into MSF’s
medical strategies in all its programs in Syria, the statement added.
“MSF hopes that independent investigators will be given immediate access to shed light on what happened,” said Christopher Stokes, MSF general director. “This latest attack and subsequent massive medical need come on top of an already catastrophic humanitarian situation, characterized by extreme violence, displacement, and deliberate destruction of medical facilities. In the case of such extreme violations of humanitarian law, humanitarian assistance cannot respond effectively and becomes meaningless itself.”